By Jerrold J. Katz
The cogito ergo sum of Descartes is likely one of the best-known--and simplest--of all philosophical formulations, yet ever because it used to be first propounded it has defied any formal accounting of its validity. How is it that so easy and demanding an issue has prompted such hassle and such philosophical controversy? during this pioneering paintings, Jerrold Katz argues that the matter with the cogito lies the place it truly is least suspected--in a deficiency within the idea of language and good judgment that Cartesian students have delivered to the research of the cogito. Katz contends that the legislation of conventional good judgment have distorted Descartes's reasoning in order that it now not suits both Descartes's personal account of the cogito in his writings or the position he assigns it in his venture. Katz proposes that the cogito will be understood to illustrate of "analytic entailment," an idea within the philosophy of language wherein a press release could be a officially legitimate inference with out looking on a legislation of common sense. constructing and protecting his thesis, he exhibits us that by means of grappling with an historic philosophical challenge it's attainable to make an unique contribution to the development of latest philosopy.
Read or Download Cogitations: a study of the cogito in relation to the philosophy of logic and language and a study of them in relation to the cogito PDF
Similar comparative religion books
This publication takes factor with those that could search to put regulations at the participation of spiritual businesses in politics, arguing that their place underestimates the advantages, and overestimates the prices, of getting religiously inspired electorate perform this fashion. it's going to attract readers in philosophy and politics.
Syncretism - the synthesis of alternative non secular - is a contentious be aware. a few regard it as a pejorative time period, bearing on neighborhood models of notionally general `world religions' that are deemed `inauthentic' simply because saturated with indigenous content material. Syncretic models of Christianity don't agree to `official' (read `European') types.
This quantity provides Theodore Abu Qurrah’s apologetic Christian theology in discussion with Islam. It explores the query of no matter if, in his try and show orthodoxy in Arabic to the Muslim reader, Abu Qurrah diverged from creedal, doctrinal Christian theology and compromised its middle content material. A complete learn of the theology of Abu Qurrah and its relation to Islamic and pre-Islamic orthodox Melkite suggestion has now not but been pursued in sleek scholarship.
This e-book proposes a entire thought of the lack of faith in human societies, with a particular and substantive specialise in the modern usa. Kevin McCaffree attracts on various disciplines together with sociology, psychology, anthropology, and heritage to discover themes akin to the starting place of faith, the position of faith in contemporary American background, the lack of faith, and the way american citizens are facing this loss.
- The True message of Jesus Christ
- Opening the Doors of Wonder: Reflections on Religious Rites of Passage
- Fighting Words: Religion, Violence, and the Interpretation of Sacred Texts
- Religion and Revelation: A Theology of Revelation in the World's Religions
- God has Many Names: Britain’s New Religious Pluralism
Additional resources for Cogitations: a study of the cogito in relation to the philosophy of logic and language and a study of them in relation to the cogito
Assume also that the logicians' notion of logical form does not exhaust the inference supporting structures we have on the broader notion of logical form. Thus, let us recognize the possibility that their nonlogical vocabulary is relevant to formal validity in a nonlogical way. Let us hypothesize further that this nonlogical way is grammatical. That is, let us suppose that some truth-preserving connections are solely a matter of the sense structure of the premiss and conclusion, and that a formal theory of sense structure could be developed within the study of grammatical structure in linguistics.
Given the possibility of theoretical explanation, the circularity that he is at such pains to exhibit can no longer be taken as a sure sign of a troubled family of concepts. It can just as well be taken as a sign that the family of semantic concepts is like normal families of theoretical concepts in logic or mathematics. Suppose we were to impose Quinian standards of explanatory success on logic or mathematics? Suppose we insist, as Quine does in semantics, that the acceptability of logic and mathematics depends on showing that logical equivalence and mathematical identity can be defined on the basis of substitution criteria?
Look at the picture of Descartes that we are given. He bungles the simple task of presenting the proper argument for his position, never notices this, and stubbornly keeps insisting on the wrong argument. What of the conflicts between the enthymematic reading and Descartes's protests against syllogistic construals or insistence on the cogito being known on the basis of a simple intuition? More muddle on Descartes's part. 30 When we step back and look at this portrait, it is hard to recognize the subject as Descartes.